Top 5 Eco Cities
By Pippa Sorley
Filed Under The Big Picture |
Every year urban sprawl spreads upon farmland, forests, and shorelines. Rural areas are rapidly losing ground to their rival cities. Hundreds of thousands of people flock each year to their nearest city in search of sustainable employment. Farmers are losing their farms, ranchers are losing their pastures, and fishermen their livelihoods. Some say it is unavoidable-with population growth comes development. And with development, comes a loss of nature. So, in light of this inevitability, we face a predicament. If cities generate the greatest pollution across continents, which ones are taking the lead in their fight against climate change? eCo Times searched for the greenest cities, attempting to find one on each continent. We picked out our Top 5 and a couple of runners up which seemed to deserve it. Each of these cities have gone above and beyond standard operating practices to implement policies and incentives to create a truly sustainable urban environment.
CURITIBA, BRAZIL (SOUTH AMERICA)
With a population of 1.6 million, Curitiba represents a model sustainable city. Faced with a fast-rising population, worsening air pollution and imminent gridlock, this city turned its center into a pedestrian-only zone and transformed several key highways into roadways reserved solely for mass transit. By planting millions of trees, the city created “green moats” to buffer against the harmful effects of polluting industry. Perhaps Curitaba’s most famous greening story is that of its innovative recycling program. The Mayor created a social and environmental revolution by offering groceries and bus passes to the city’s poor in return for bags of recyclables. The result? Two-thirds of Curitiba’s garbage is recycled.
VAXJO, SWEDEN (EUROPE)
The Nordic countries of Europe continue to excel when it comes to environmental stewardship. Winner of the Sustainable Energy for Europe Campaign Award in 2007, Växjö , Sweden, is a stark example . The city made a pledge in 1996 to become fossil-fuel free. With the cooperation of the city’s administration, NGO’s, universities, and individuals, as well as the energy, housing, and transport sectors, Växjö is well on its way to meeting this goal. In 1980, at a time when environmental issues were barely a blip on the planetary radar, Vaxjo created an energy company that used biomass to produce heating and electricity. By 2006, the city had succeeded in reducing its CO2 emissions per capita by 30% since 1993. US citizens emit around 20 tonnes per year, the EU’s per capita emissions average 10 tonnes, and China’s roughly 5 tonnes. Today, the citizens of Växjö emit a mere 3 tonnes of CO2 emissions per year, a level far below the global average. With such impressive numbers, Växjö produces a carbon footprint similar to that found in many developing countries, while still maintaining high living standards.
TORONTO, CANADA (NORTH AMERICA)
Toronto boasts a population of over 5 million, a number that represents almost one sixth of the whole population of Canada. By implementing programs to cut overall emissions from its own facilities by 42%, Toronto is recognized as one of the greenest cities in North America. It uses cold water from Lake Ontario to cool its buildings in summer, saving up to 90% on electricity compared to conventional air-conditioning systems. The city has also established the Toronto Atmospheric Fund which creates new programs to accelerate the incubation and scale-up of low carbon initiatives in Toronto.
KAMPALA, UGANDA (AFRICA)
Uganda has long been hailed as Africa’s friendliest country, but in a continent that is plagued by poverty, corruption, and political instability there are few cities that stand out for their environmental leadership. Kampala is the exception to the rule. Under the present Ugandan administration, it has created six new national parks and implemented community-based eco-tourism projects at the grassroots level. In 2006, the city mayor launched their new bus service and dramatically reduced congestion by commuter taxis, while also making transport fares more affordable. The city of Kampala is also one of the most socially progressive cities in Africa by promoting women’s rights and developing revolutionary policies towards curbing the HIV/AIDS pandemic.
SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA (AUSTRALIA)
This city of 4 million embraces eco-friendly energy usage on a daily basis by creating innovative programs like Earth Power, a green waste generator that turns waste into gas through anaerobic digestion (no, not a new diet trend). This combustion-free process produces power by converting thousands of tons of leftover food from participating restaurants and supermarkets into electricity and high-nutrient fertilizer. Projections show that by the year 2030, Sydney will demand 95% of energy required for its entire home state. In light of this stark fact, the administration has made a goal to reduce energy usage in buildings and transportation, and has identified significant energy savings potential for its city properties and street lighting.
REYKJAVIK, ICELAND (RUNNER-UP)
Although the population of Reykjavik is small with 118,000 residents, its ambition is large. The city plans to become the world’s first hydrogen city. With access to remarkable geothermal and hydro electric resources, Iceland is able to provide 70% of the energy to its inhabitants, and aims to become a hydrogen economy by 2050. Although still dependent on oil, Reykjavik opened a hydrogen fueling station in 2003 to test three hydrogen fuel cell buses. The hydrogen gas is produced by electrolysis -a process that sends a current through water to split it into hydrogen and oxygen. The public buses could run all day before needing refueling. General Motors, Toyota and DaimlerChrysler are using the island-nation as a test market for their hydrogen fuel cell prototypes, with plans to sell the fuel-cell vehicles by 2010.
PUERTO PRINCESA, PHILIPPINES (RUNNER-UP)
Puerto Princesa City, located on Palawan Island, is geographically the largest city in the Philippines. With 75% forest cover, Puerto Princesa is one of the largest sanctuaries of old growth and replanted forest in the world and is home to two UNESCO World Heritage Sites. Through the vision of their Mayor, the city’s dump – once located meters away from a school – was relocated and transformed into the first engineered sanitary landfill in the Philippines. It is also home to one of the most advanced waste management systems in the world. The city government is ISO 9001 certified, making ecology a central focus. To protect the oceans, the administration has halted destructive fishing techniques such as trawling, dynamite fishing, and cyanide fishing. Puerto Princesa is also one of the first cities to mandate that all tricycle taxis convert to LPG (liquid petroleum gas).
On the whole, it is a challenge to identify the greenest cities in the world, as there are so many different factors to consider and varying criteria to measure. For instance, several cities and countries have been named the greenest place simply due to the fact that they have lots of parks and green land, but what if those same areas are making minimal effort to reduce greenhouse gases, improve energy efficiency, and invest in renewables? What about those cities that lack recycling incentives and rather ship their trash abroad? Or is it fair to compare a resource-rich Reykjavik to an arid, energy-starved city in Africa? Nevertheless, it is important to recognize those cities that serve as models to their neighbors. Several cities are being built with sustainability as the key feature, like Dongtan, China and Clonburris, Ireland, which should be constructed within the next few years. If you know of some great cities that are making headway towards urban sustainability, please post your recommendations here. We’d love to learn about the top eco cities according to you!
Posted on May 29, 2008 |
Comments
18 Responses to “Top 5 Eco Cities”
Leave a Reply
-
Buy eCo Products
According to the Brookings Institute newest study….Large metro areas offer greater energy and carbon efficiency than nonmetropolitan areas….
There research only focused on U.S cities.
Check out the data here:
http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/29/carbon-footprints-of-top-100-metro-areas-researched-by-brookings/
Anything we do to bring people closer together so that they can share transportation, cooler buildings, food sources, heat supplies, is good for the environment. Remember,we are a major part of the environment, and collectively can demand and pay for recycling and reuse where individuals in the countryside may not. The idea isn’t to return to huts in open fields, 17 century style, but to make better use of the resources we have for the benefit of all people, like public libraries, transportation, parks, community gardens, and the like. We have to learn to like one-another and live more as brothers and sisters to achieve a communally beneficial environment.
Hi Uncle B - I suppose you’re right; the romantic ideal of living remotely doesn’t seem sustainable anymore based on our ever-increasing population and demands on our diminishing resources. So, in light of this, we must make the most of our cities.
Do you think that the era of rural homes and off the grid living is a thing of the past?
uhh… i’ve lived in toronto most of my life and while its relatively green i think you’re giving it a little too much credit here. person for person there are as many cars here than LA. also… wouldn’t cooling our city in the lake have desasterous effects on marine life? luckily this is the first i’ve heard of it.
good reading though, there are some great ideas here.
I’ve been to Curitiba a couple of times and while it is a pleasant place and a model (hard) to be followed by the Latin American Governments it is far away from being listed amongst the top 5 eco-cities in the world. Why not Brisbane in Australia is listed? What about Osaka in Japan?
Curitiba is a very nice town, but overrated for this list.
[...] site Eco Cities - dos ecochatos - elegeu nuestra capital pararanaense entre as cinco cidades mais ecológicas do [...]
[...] By Pippa Sorley via ecotimes.com [...]
Based on much of the feedback we have received in regard to this article, eCo Times will do a follow up of Top 5 Eco Cities per country, i.e. North America, Asia, South America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand. Thanks for your suggestions, and please Stay tuned for more!
http://portal.rpc.com.br/gazetadopovo/vidaecidadania/conteudo.phtml?tl=1&id=772854&tit=Rio-Iguacu-o-2-mais-poluido-do-pais-nao-tem-perspectiva-de-melhora
Rio Iguaçu, o 2º mais poluído do país, não tem perspectiva de melhora
O rio que corta o Paraná é o segundo mais poluído do Brasil. Elevada quantidade de moradores na bacia do Iguaçu e baixa vazão são apontados como agravantes da poluição
As famílias que vivem ao redor do Rio Iguaçu, em Curitiba e região metropolitana, vão continuar sofrendo com a poluição nos próximos anos. A afirmação foi feita pelo gerente da agência de bacias do Alto Iguaçu, Enéias Souza Machado, da Superintendência de Desenvolvimento de Recursos Hídricos e Saneamento Ambiental (Suderhsa), órgão ligado à Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente (Sema).
Here is a translation (from iGoogle) of the above:
The river quRio Iguacu, 2 of the most polluted of the country, has no prospect of improvement
The river that bisects the Parana is the second most polluted of Brazil. High number of residents in the basin do Iguacu and low flow are singled out as aggravating pollution.
The families who live around the Iguacu River, in Curitiba and the metropolitan region, will continue suffering from the pollution in the coming years. The statement was made by the agency’s manager of the High basins Iguacu, Enéias Souza Machado, the Superintendency of Water Resources Development and Environmental Sanitation (Suderhsa), a body linked to the Secretariat of State of the Environment (Sema).
[...] conditioning blasting, but apparently Toronto is one of the top five green cities on the planet. eCo Times writes: TORONTO, CANADA (NORTH AMERICA) Toronto boasts a population of over 5 million, a number [...]
Well, this kind of thing is very heartening to see.
Irrelevant:
i thought it was really funny that you used the word “stark” for Växsjö, i didnt know what it meant in english and had to look it up, but it means “strong” in swedish!
Sorry to bring a pessimistic note, as I think it is a great idea to promote positive practice. But, being a Sydney-sider, if Sydney is a world’s top eco-city then I am now more scared than encouraged. Sydney has modelled itself on places like Los Angeles, and expanded its road system dramatically while virtually neglecting its public transport system (do not even start to mention infrastructure for cyclists: it is virtually non-existent). I think it is better to look at “positive initiatives” in places, but they do need to be put in a broader context…Sydney would have a huge distance to cover to match many European cities. So perhaps if Sydney is the “best per continent” it doesn’t mean a lot in a continent that is doing very little…
Thanks Warwick for the inside perspective on Sydney. How disheartening to hear that the city models itself after LA - UGH! Do you know of any other cities or towns in Australia that IS making strides or leading the way? If so, I’d love to hear…
i just readed the note about the greenest cities & i realized a big mistake in it. When U say, pipa, U attempted to find one city in each continent, and next, in your list appear as this before mentioned, SouthAmerica, Europe, NorthAmerica, Africa & Autralia. Is this mistake innocent and this is because of your ignorance? or is this one example more about the Yankicentrism ? An evolution from our wellknown eurocentrism? In wich a continent is erased in the words, to leave the place to a new pattern, in wich NorthAmerica is a whole new continent, separated from SouthAmerica.
Let me say U that what happen with bankrupt constructions like this one is that speaks louder than any idea after developed. It´s that, what idea can be developed after this? What idea about healthing the world can have its roots in this abusive model, the same abusive model that NorthAmerica, like a Non-ethical Empire is occuped to comunicate and propagate.
Thanks for your feedback Maira.
According to Nations Online:All Countries of the World (http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/continents.htm)
there are varying opinions that are taught to students around the world when it comes to the definition of a continent:
“How many Continents are there in the world?
5 continents
We have been taught in school (way back in the 60’s in Europe) that there are five continents, Africa, America, Asia, Australia and Europe, for instance symbolised in the five rings of the Olympic Games.
6 continents
However, there is no standard definition for the number of continents. In Europe, many students are taught about six continents, where North and South America is combined to form a single America.
These six continents are Africa, America, Antarctica, Asia, Australia/Oceania, and Europe.
7 continents
By most standards, there are a maximum of seven continents - Africa, Antarctica, Asia, Australia/Oceania, Europe, North America, and South America. Many geographers and scientists now refer to six continents, where Europe and Asia are combined (because they’re one solid landmass).
These six continents are then Africa, Antarctica, Australia/Oceania, Eurasia, North America, and South America. ”
Sorry if you feel offended by our separating the continent of America into North and South America; this was not out of ignorance, rather, out of a desire to recognize the vast difference between these 2 “land masses” especially when it comes to cultural priorities and environmental policies.
I was surprised not to see Vancouver, British Columbia on there, as it makes most lists. Toronto is a great city and have also made it illegal to spray pesticides on home lawns, which will help keep waterways clean, safe wildlife and domestic pets.
Dagny
http://www.onnotextiles.com
organic apparel